Is: a systematic critique by utilizing randomized,controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc ; Jan: . . Elmunzer BJ,Higgins PD,et al. Does rectal indomethacin get rid of the have to have for prophylactic pancreatic stent placement in individuals undergoing highrisk ERCP. Am J Gastroenterol ; Mar: . . Cotton PB,Lehman G,et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc ; MayJun: . Disclosure of Interest: None declaredP BALLOON CATHETER VERSUS BASKET CATHETER FOR ENDOSCOPIC BILE DUCT STONE EXTRACTION: A MULTICENTRE,Prospective RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL H. Ishiwatari,H. Hisai,K. Yane,M. Onodera,T. Hayashi,K. Eto,S. Haba,T. Okuda,H. Ihara,T. Kukitsu,R. Matsumoto,K. Kawakubo,K. Kitaoka,M. Ono,H. Kawakami,A. Katanuma,T. Sonoda Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology,Sapporo Healthcare University,Sapporo,Japanese Red Cross Date Basic Hospital,Date,TeineKeijinkai Hospital,Sapporo,AbashiriKosei General Hospital,Abashiri,MedChemExpress Sodium stibogluconate Tomakomai City Hospital,Tomakomai,NTT East Japan Sapporo Hospital,Sapporo,Oji General Hospital,Tomakomai,KKR Sapporo Medical Center Tonan Hospital,Sapporo,Rumoi City Hospital,Rumoi,ObihiroKosei Common hospital,Obihiro,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology,Hokkaido University Hospital,Sapporo,Otaru Ekisaikai Hospital,Otaru,Division of Public Well being,Sapporo Healthcare University,Sapporo,Japan Contact Email Address: ishihirogmail Introduction: Endoscopic bile duct stone PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21381057 (BDS) removal employing the basket or balloon catheter is often a wellestablished therapy. However,the choice of extraction devices depends on the operators preference for the reason that there has been no study comparing outcomes with the two catheters. Aims Procedures: We carried out a noninferiority trial to investigate the performance of individual catheter for stone extraction. Sufferers using a BDS diameter mm and typical bile duct diameter mm were enrolled in this study. The participants have been randomly assigned to groups that had been treated together with the basket or the balloon catheter at hospitals from October by means of September . Right after stone extraction with the assigned catheter was completed,balloon occlusion cholangiography was performed in each groups to confirm the clearance from the duct. Primary endpoint was the price of complete clearance in the duct by the assigned catheter. Secondary endpoints were the rate and time of comprehensive clearance in one particular endoscopic session. Outcomes: We initially enrolled consecutive individuals,but sufferers were excluded immediately after randomisation. The total number of sufferers available for analysis was . The rates of complete clearance by the assigned catheter have been . ( in the balloon group and . in the basket group. The distinction in the prices amongst the two groups was . ,indicating failure of noninferiority on the basket catheter (noninferiority limit ; p. for noninferiority). On the other hand,the results revealed superiority of the balloon more than the basket catheter (p.). There had been no important differences in secondary endpoints. Conclusion: The balloon catheter is encouraged to get a firstline device of endoscopic BDS removal. This study was registered around the UMIN Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN). Disclosure of Interest: None declaredUnited European Gastroenterology Journal (S) P A NOVEL MODIFIED Method TO SINGLEBALLOON ENTEROSCOPY FOR ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY IN Individuals WITH ALTERED GASTROINTESTINAL ANATOMY H. Tamaki,T. Noda,S. Arasawa,M. Izuta,A. Kubo,C. Ogawa,T. Matsunaka,M. Shibatoge Division o.
