Dical students; PS: Pharmacy students; SPICE: Student Perceptions of PhysicianPharmacist Interprofessional Clinical Education; TTUHSC: Texas

Dical students; PS: Pharmacy students; SPICE: Student Perceptions of PhysicianPharmacist Interprofessional Clinical Education; TTUHSC: Texas Tech University Well being Sciences Center. Competing interests The authors declare that they’ve no competing interests. Authors’ contributions JZ,EM,AM,and DF conceived and created this study even though JZ was a pharmacotherapy resident and assistant clinical instructor at Texas Tech University Overall health Sciences Center. JZ recruited patients for participation in theZorek et al. BMC Healthcare Education ,: biomedcentralPage ofclinic. EM coordinated pharmacy and health-related students’ recruitment. EM and AM obtained informed consent from individuals and students. EM,AM,MS,and RY offered clinical services and served as preceptors for students. JZ managed the data collection and entry processes. JZ and DF performed information evaluation. JZ wrote the very first draft with the manuscript.Safety and privacy requirements for any multiinstitutional cancer study information grid: an interviewbased studyFrank J Manion,Robert J Robbins,William A Weems and Rebecca S CrowleyAddress: Data Science and Technologies,Fox Chase Cancer Center,Philadelphia PA,USA,Facts Technology,Fred Hutchinson Cancer Study Center,Seattle WA,USA,Academic Technology,University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston,USA and Biomedical Informatics,University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine,Pittsburgh PA,USA Email: Frank J Manion Frank.Manionfccc.edu; Robert J Linaprazan Robbins rrobbinsfhcrc.org; William A Weems william.a.weemsuth.tmc.edu; Rebecca S Crowley crowleyrsupmc.edu Corresponding authorPublished: June BMC Healthcare Informatics and Choice Producing ,: doi:.: October Accepted: JuneThis write-up is out there from: biomedcentral Manion et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This really is an Open Access article distributed beneath the terms in the Inventive Commons Attribution License (http:creativecommons.orglicensesby.),which permits unrestricted use,distribution,and reproduction in any medium,offered the original function is effectively cited.AbstractBackground: Information protection is vital for all details systems that handle humansubjects data. Gridbased systems like the cancer Biomedical Informatics Grid (caBIG) seek to create new mechanisms to facilitate realtime federation of cancerrelevant information sources,including sources protected below a variety of regulatory laws,for example HIPAA and CFR. These systems embody new models for data sharing,and hence pose new challenges for the regulatory community,and to individuals who would create or adopt them. These challenges have to be understood by each systems developers and system adopters. Within this paper,we describe our operate collecting policy statements,expectations,and requirements from regulatory selection makers at academic cancer centers in the United states of america. We use these statements to examine basic assumptions with regards to information sharing using information federations and grid computing. Strategies: An interviewbased study of key stakeholders from a sample of US cancer centers. Interviews were structured,and PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28490900 applied an instrument that was created for the purpose of this study. The instrument integrated a set of issue scenarios tricky policy scenarios that have been derived for the duration of a fullday discussion of potentially problematic difficulties by a set of project participants with diverse experience. Each and every challenge scenario integrated a set of openended queries that have been created to elucidate stakeholder opinions and issues. Interviews had been transcri.