1177/1754073913477505. ?Eder, A. B., Musseler, J., Hommel, B. (2012). The structure of affective action representations: temporal binding of affective response codes. Psychological Research, 76, 111?18. doi:10. 1007/s00426-011-0327-6. Eder, A. B., Rothermund, K., De Houwer, J., Hommel, B. (2015). Directive and incentive functions of affective action consequences: an FGF-401 Ideomotor strategy. Psychological Study, 79, 630?49. doi:ten.1007/s00426-014-0590-4. Elsner, B., Hommel, B. (2001). Impact anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Functionality, 27, 229?40. doi:ten.1037/0096-1523.27.1. 229. Fodor, E. M. (2010). Power motivation. In O. C. Schultheiss J. C. Brunstein (Eds.), Implicit motives (pp. three?9). Oxford: University Press. Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., Magee, J. C. (2003). From energy to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.three.453. Greenwald, A. G. (1970). Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance manage: with particular reference to the ideo-motor mechanism. Psychological Evaluation, 77, 73?9. doi:ten.1037/h0028689. Hommel, B. (2013). Ideomotor action control: on the perceptual grounding of voluntary actions and agents. In W. Prinz, M. Beisert, A. Herwig (Eds.), Action Science: Foundations of an Emerging Discipline (pp. 113?36). Cambridge: MIT Press. ?Hommel, B., Musseler, J., Aschersleben, G., Prinz, W. (2001). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action organizing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849?78. doi:ten.1017/S0140525X01000103. Kahneman, D., Wakker, P. P., Sarin, R. (1997). Back to Bentham? Explorations of skilled utility. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 375?05. a0023781 doi:ten.1162/003355397555235. ?Kollner, M. G., Schultheiss, O. C. (2014). Meta-analytic evidence of low convergence involving implicit and explicit measures from the requires for achievement, affiliation, and power. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00826. Latham, G. P., Piccolo, R. F. (2012). The effect of context-specific versus nonspecific subconscious objectives on employee efficiency. Human Resource Management, 51, 511?23. doi:ten. 1002/hrm.21486. Lavender, T., Hommel, B. (2007). Affect and action: towards an event-coding account. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 1270?296. doi:10.1080/02699930701438152. Locke, E. A., Latham, G. P. (2002). Developing a virtually useful theory of target setting and job motivation: a 35-year a0023781 doi:10.1162/003355397555235. ?Kollner, M. G., Schultheiss, O. C. (2014). Meta-analytic evidence of low convergence among implicit and explicit measures from the desires for achievement, affiliation, and power. Frontiers in Psychology, five. doi:ten.3389/fpsyg.2014.00826. Latham, G. P., Piccolo, R. F. (2012). The impact of context-specific versus nonspecific subconscious objectives on employee efficiency. Human Resource Management, 51, 511?23. doi:ten. 1002/hrm.21486. Lavender, T., Hommel, B. (2007). Impact and action: towards an event-coding account. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 1270?296. doi:ten.1080/02699930701438152. Locke, E. A., Latham, G. P. (2002). Constructing a practically helpful theory of objective setting and process motivation: a 35-year 10508619.2011.638589 odyssey. American Psychologist, 57, 705?17. doi:10.1037/0003-066X. 57.9.705. Marien, H., Aarts, H., Custers, R. (2015). The interactive part of action-outcome learning and good affective information in motivating human goal-directed behavior. Motivation Science, 1, 165?83. doi:10.1037/mot0000021. McClelland, D. C. (1985). How motives, skills, and values figure out what persons do. American Psychologist, 40, 812?25. doi:10. 1037/0003-066X.40.7.812. McClelland, D. C. (1987). Human motivation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.motivating people to choosing the actions that enhance their well-being.Acknowledgments We thank Leonie Eshuis and Tamara de Kloe for their support with Study 2. Compliance with ethical standards Ethical statement Each studies received ethical approval in the Faculty Ethics Evaluation Committee from the Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences at Utrecht University. All participants supplied written informed consent ahead of participation. Open Access This article.
