Visualize the hybridization signal directly. The chromosome slides were counterstained with propidium iodide (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) and analyzed using an Olympus BX53 microscope.RT-PCR AnalysisTotal RNA was isolated using Trizol (Tiangen, CN) from different tissues of the transgenic (#040825) and wide-type cattle, including heart, liver, spleen, lung, kidney, abomasums, small intestine, brain and adipose. One microgram of total RNA was used for first-strand cDNA synthesis by using M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase (Promega, USA). The reaction was carried out for 1 hour at 37uC for oligodT in a total volume of 25 ml. The forward primer F (59-AACTGCACAGCAAACCCTCT-39) was designed spanning the exon 3 and exon 4 sequence of LDLRAD3 and the reverse primers R (59-GTCGGCTTGGTTCAGAGACT-39) were designed in the exon 6, giving rise to 555 bp products. A 477 bp fragment of the bovine GAPDH gene amplified by primers GAPDH F (59-GCAAGTTCCACGGCACAG-39) and GAPDH R (59-CGCCAGTAGAAGCAGGGAT-39) was used as internal control.GTG-binding and FISH AnalysisEar skin fibroblasts were isolated from the three transgenic cattle as described previously [19]. The chromosomes were Gbanded before hybridization using the GTG technique. Briefly,Reliable Method for Lecirelin custom synthesis transgene IdentificationResults and Discussion Determination of Transgene Insertion Sites by NextGeneration SequencingTo evaluate the biosafety of the transgenic cloned cattle for commercial use, the transgene integration site(s) must be identified. The transgene in the present study is an approximately 150-kb hLF BAC ligated into the multiple cloning site of the pBeloBAC vector which was obtained by screening a human BAC library. Then the transgene construct was released from the pBeloBAC vector by NotI digestion and used for transfection (Figure 1). Initial attempts to identify the integration site of the BAC in the bovine genome using the widely used genome walking strategy (Clontech, USA), which employs restriction enzyme cleavage and adaptor-ligated genomic DNA fragments, were unsuccessful (data not shown). For the regular PCR-based genome walking techniques, successful amplification of the transgene depends on the restriction fragment and the random primers. In this case, the available restriction sites are unknown, resulting in nonspecific amplification or no amplification, and correspondingly, these techniques, which can be labor-intensive and prone to error, are not always reliable for characterizing transgenic animals [20]. In addition, characterizing multiple copies of transgenes throughout the host genome is also not feasible [12]. In this study, multiple and nonspecific products that could not be blasted against the bovine genome database were obtained, suggesting a break in the BAC and the integration of multiple copies of the transgene. Because the specific transgene 15826876 integration sites could not be identified by PCR, we investigated the use of next-generation sequencing and subsequent bioinformatic analysis to characterize the sequence signature of the hLF BAC transgene, verify the exact insertion site(s) and (-)-Indolactam V biological activity determine the copy number in three individual transgenic cattle. Initially, genomic DNA from the two founder transgenic cows was sequenced in parallel to map the hLF BAC transgene insertions. In addition, genomic DNA from cow #101026 was sequenced to evaluate the trans-generational stability of the transgene. Each DNA sample was sequenced to approximatelyFigure 3. Verification of the integra.Visualize the hybridization signal directly. The chromosome slides were counterstained with propidium iodide (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) and analyzed using an Olympus BX53 microscope.RT-PCR AnalysisTotal RNA was isolated using Trizol (Tiangen, CN) from different tissues of the transgenic (#040825) and wide-type cattle, including heart, liver, spleen, lung, kidney, abomasums, small intestine, brain and adipose. One microgram of total RNA was used for first-strand cDNA synthesis by using M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase (Promega, USA). The reaction was carried out for 1 hour at 37uC for oligodT in a total volume of 25 ml. The forward primer F (59-AACTGCACAGCAAACCCTCT-39) was designed spanning the exon 3 and exon 4 sequence of LDLRAD3 and the reverse primers R (59-GTCGGCTTGGTTCAGAGACT-39) were designed in the exon 6, giving rise to 555 bp products. A 477 bp fragment of the bovine GAPDH gene amplified by primers GAPDH F (59-GCAAGTTCCACGGCACAG-39) and GAPDH R (59-CGCCAGTAGAAGCAGGGAT-39) was used as internal control.GTG-binding and FISH AnalysisEar skin fibroblasts were isolated from the three transgenic cattle as described previously [19]. The chromosomes were Gbanded before hybridization using the GTG technique. Briefly,Reliable Method for Transgene IdentificationResults and Discussion Determination of Transgene Insertion Sites by NextGeneration SequencingTo evaluate the biosafety of the transgenic cloned cattle for commercial use, the transgene integration site(s) must be identified. The transgene in the present study is an approximately 150-kb hLF BAC ligated into the multiple cloning site of the pBeloBAC vector which was obtained by screening a human BAC library. Then the transgene construct was released from the pBeloBAC vector by NotI digestion and used for transfection (Figure 1). Initial attempts to identify the integration site of the BAC in the bovine genome using the widely used genome walking strategy (Clontech, USA), which employs restriction enzyme cleavage and adaptor-ligated genomic DNA fragments, were unsuccessful (data not shown). For the regular PCR-based genome walking techniques, successful amplification of the transgene depends on the restriction fragment and the random primers. In this case, the available restriction sites are unknown, resulting in nonspecific amplification or no amplification, and correspondingly, these techniques, which can be labor-intensive and prone to error, are not always reliable for characterizing transgenic animals [20]. In addition, characterizing multiple copies of transgenes throughout the host genome is also not feasible [12]. In this study, multiple and nonspecific products that could not be blasted against the bovine genome database were obtained, suggesting a break in the BAC and the integration of multiple copies of the transgene. Because the specific transgene 15826876 integration sites could not be identified by PCR, we investigated the use of next-generation sequencing and subsequent bioinformatic analysis to characterize the sequence signature of the hLF BAC transgene, verify the exact insertion site(s) and determine the copy number in three individual transgenic cattle. Initially, genomic DNA from the two founder transgenic cows was sequenced in parallel to map the hLF BAC transgene insertions. In addition, genomic DNA from cow #101026 was sequenced to evaluate the trans-generational stability of the transgene. Each DNA sample was sequenced to approximatelyFigure 3. Verification of the integra.
