The expression constructs for CRABP2 and PGAM1 with removed 59-UTRs encoded full-length 4EGI-1 web proteins while the constructs with 59-UTRs caused the expression of smaller artificial peptides (Fig. 3A and Materials and Methods). Co-transfection of YFP1-CRABP2 with YFP2-ARL11 and YFP1PGAM1 with YFP2- ARL11 fusion proteins into HEK-293T cells produced strong fluorescent signals confirming the interactions between these proteins (Fig. 3B and Materials and Methods). CRABP2 is a cytosolic protein that moves into the nucleus upon binding with RA [9]. Our immunoflouresence data indicated that ARL11 binding to CRABP2 is associated with the cytosol-tonucleus movement, but it is uncertain whether it plays any role in the reconfiguration of the functional nuclear localization signal of the CRABP2-RA-ARL11 complex. For PGAM1, the strong cytoplasmic immunoflouresence signal was consistent with the known cytosolic localization of the protein [19]. We further confirmed the interactions between ARL11 with CRABP2 and PGAM1 by co-immunoprecipitation. Proteins expressed by the constructs with removed 59-UTRs expressing the correct fulllength proteins were co-immunoprecipitated with the ARL11 protein (Fig. 3C and 3D, and Materials and Methods). In order to assess the interference of 59-UTRs with the screening process of the cDNA library, we performed additional co-immunoprecipitation experiments using the expression constructs containing YFP1-tagged CRABP2 and PGAM1 inserts with and without 59-UTRs. The full-length proteins expressed by the 59-UTR-deleted constructs could again be co-immunoprecipitated with ARL11, whereas the artificial proteins expressed by the constructs containing 59-UTRs produced non-specific interactions with ARL11 (Fig. 3E and 3F, and Materials and Methods). The correct binding proteins could not be identified in the immunoprecipitates. Therefore, as predicted from the sequence analyses, the use of a cDNA library produced from mRNAs that contain 59-UTRs would have interfered with the identification of the correct partner proteins for ARL11.Techniques that measure interactions between proteins interrogate two partner proteins, called the bait and the prey, coupled to two halves of the transcription factor [2] and the two halves of the fluorescent protein [25]. If the proteins make contact, they reconstitute a transcriptional factor that activates a reporter gene in the yeast two-hybrid system or they reconstitute a flourescently active protein in the protein complementation assay. These two frequently used binary systems that measure interactions between a limited number of two proteins have recently been complemented by high-throughput platforms that can measure multiple binary interactions or interactions among groups of proteins [26,27]. These platforms typically utilize a combination of luminescence or fluorescence tags with immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry [26,28,29]. False-positive and false-negative interactions can skew the results, which is the main challenge in this field. Initial efforts to address this issue were focused on improving the specificity of interactions with the transcriptional activator. In order to accomplish this, a new reporter gene, CYC1-lacZ, which contains three consensus binding sides for GAL4, was developed to reduce false-positive activations of the reporter gene [30]. In addition, a combination of co-transformations and yeast genetic mating techniques with several rounds of buy HIF-2��-IN-1 screenings was developed.The expression constructs for CRABP2 and PGAM1 with removed 59-UTRs encoded full-length proteins while the constructs with 59-UTRs caused the expression of smaller artificial peptides (Fig. 3A and Materials and Methods). Co-transfection of YFP1-CRABP2 with YFP2-ARL11 and YFP1PGAM1 with YFP2- ARL11 fusion proteins into HEK-293T cells produced strong fluorescent signals confirming the interactions between these proteins (Fig. 3B and Materials and Methods). CRABP2 is a cytosolic protein that moves into the nucleus upon binding with RA [9]. Our immunoflouresence data indicated that ARL11 binding to CRABP2 is associated with the cytosol-tonucleus movement, but it is uncertain whether it plays any role in the reconfiguration of the functional nuclear localization signal of the CRABP2-RA-ARL11 complex. For PGAM1, the strong cytoplasmic immunoflouresence signal was consistent with the known cytosolic localization of the protein [19]. We further confirmed the interactions between ARL11 with CRABP2 and PGAM1 by co-immunoprecipitation. Proteins expressed by the constructs with removed 59-UTRs expressing the correct fulllength proteins were co-immunoprecipitated with the ARL11 protein (Fig. 3C and 3D, and Materials and Methods). In order to assess the interference of 59-UTRs with the screening process of the cDNA library, we performed additional co-immunoprecipitation experiments using the expression constructs containing YFP1-tagged CRABP2 and PGAM1 inserts with and without 59-UTRs. The full-length proteins expressed by the 59-UTR-deleted constructs could again be co-immunoprecipitated with ARL11, whereas the artificial proteins expressed by the constructs containing 59-UTRs produced non-specific interactions with ARL11 (Fig. 3E and 3F, and Materials and Methods). The correct binding proteins could not be identified in the immunoprecipitates. Therefore, as predicted from the sequence analyses, the use of a cDNA library produced from mRNAs that contain 59-UTRs would have interfered with the identification of the correct partner proteins for ARL11.Techniques that measure interactions between proteins interrogate two partner proteins, called the bait and the prey, coupled to two halves of the transcription factor [2] and the two halves of the fluorescent protein [25]. If the proteins make contact, they reconstitute a transcriptional factor that activates a reporter gene in the yeast two-hybrid system or they reconstitute a flourescently active protein in the protein complementation assay. These two frequently used binary systems that measure interactions between a limited number of two proteins have recently been complemented by high-throughput platforms that can measure multiple binary interactions or interactions among groups of proteins [26,27]. These platforms typically utilize a combination of luminescence or fluorescence tags with immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry [26,28,29]. False-positive and false-negative interactions can skew the results, which is the main challenge in this field. Initial efforts to address this issue were focused on improving the specificity of interactions with the transcriptional activator. In order to accomplish this, a new reporter gene, CYC1-lacZ, which contains three consensus binding sides for GAL4, was developed to reduce false-positive activations of the reporter gene [30]. In addition, a combination of co-transformations and yeast genetic mating techniques with several rounds of screenings was developed.
